<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Sidewiki: Forcing the Social Media Hand of Pharma?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://prforpharma.com/2009/10/15/google-sidewiki-forcing-the-social-media-hand-of-pharma/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://prforpharma.com/2009/10/15/google-sidewiki-forcing-the-social-media-hand-of-pharma/#utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
	<description>Discussions about social media, PR and marketing for pharmaceutical companies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 21:23:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Should Pharma Companies Institute a No Posting on Google Sidewiki Policy? &#124; PRforPharma</title>
		<link>http://prforpharma.com/2009/10/15/google-sidewiki-forcing-the-social-media-hand-of-pharma/comment-page-1/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Should Pharma Companies Institute a No Posting on Google Sidewiki Policy? &#124; PRforPharma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 17:56:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prforpharma.com/?p=37#comment-4</guid>
		<description>[...] yesterday’s post, I speculated that Google Sidewiki’s arrival on the social media scene may force the hand of Big [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] yesterday’s post, I speculated that Google Sidewiki’s arrival on the social media scene may force the hand of Big [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

